We can always have a plugin (and there are already) that adds any amount of flags to $.browser. As long as we don't need to bifurcate the core's code, there's no need for this addition IMO.
-- Ariel Flesler http://flesler.blogspot.com/ On Sep 17, 9:25 am, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The word 'safari' is just legacy - just pretend that it's 'webkit'. > > --John > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Firefox isn't even in jQuery.browser, so unlikely Chrome will be. If Chrome > > is added, Firefox should be too. Although Safari is in it instead of WebKit > > (not sure why that is, especially since the version does not match the > > browser). > > > --Sam > > > 2008/9/16 jonhobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> I wish this is true but unfortunately it doesn't seem to be. > > >> <select> lists look completely different for example. > > >> Jon > > >> On Sep 4, 1:29 pm, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Don't see a reason to add it. Really should be treated any differently > >> > than > >> > any other WebKit engine is (unfortunately named 'safari' in .browsers). > > >> > --John > > >> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Erik Beeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > Chrome on Vista is reporting: > >> > > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 > >> > > (KHTML, > >> > > like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13 > > >> > > Will this be added to jQuery.browser? > > >> > > --Erik --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
