The word 'safari' is just legacy - just pretend that it's 'webkit'. --John
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Firefox isn't even in jQuery.browser, so unlikely Chrome will be. If Chrome > is added, Firefox should be too. Although Safari is in it instead of WebKit > (not sure why that is, especially since the version does not match the > browser). > > --Sam > > 2008/9/16 jonhobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> I wish this is true but unfortunately it doesn't seem to be. >> >> <select> lists look completely different for example. >> >> Jon >> >> On Sep 4, 1:29 pm, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Don't see a reason to add it. Really should be treated any differently >> > than >> > any other WebKit engine is (unfortunately named 'safari' in .browsers). >> > >> > --John >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Erik Beeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> > > Chrome on Vista is reporting: >> > > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 >> > > (KHTML, >> > > like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13 >> > >> > > Will this be added to jQuery.browser? >> > >> > > --Erik >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
