On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:54:08 -0700, David Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Dean Edwards <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Mar 24, 8:09 pm, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Why would you want this? >>> >> >> It will stop plugins from interfering with each other. >> >> If a plugin has an error in its document.ready handler it will prevent >> subsequent handlers from running. A bad plugin can affect other jQuery >> code. > > Ignoring everything else, is this specific sort of behavior desirable? > I feel like a bad plugin that's broken out of the box should call > attention to its brokenness. > But what if a plugin which does something purely cosmetic (say rounded corners) breaks because e.g. it expects to access a URL which is temporarily unavailable. Would you want the rest of your web application to break in this instance? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
