Won't you get only the latest exception thrown or will you get all the exceptions? I never used exceptions that intensely in javascript.
2009/3/24 John Resig <[email protected]> > > > I don't think it is the resposibility of the dispatcher to handle > > exceptions. > > I think it it is the resposibility of the dispatcher to dispatch > > events. :-) > > An error in one handler should not prevent another handler from > > executing. > > Nor should a dispatcher suppress errors so that it can complete its > > task. > > Why not just use try/finally, then? > Online here, as well: > http://ejohn.org/files/handler.html > > <script> > function runHandlers(i){ > i = i || 0; > try { > while ( i < handlers.length ) { > handlers[i](); > i++; > } > } finally { > if ( i < handlers.length ) { > runHandlers( i + 1 ); > } > } > } > > var handlers = [ > function(){ > document.write("testA<br>"); > throw "A"; > }, > function(){ > document.write("testB<br>"); > } > ]; > > try { > runHandlers(); > } catch(e){ > document.write("ERROR: " + e + "<br>"); > } > </script> > > Output: > testA > testB > ERROR: A > > I don't think the order of the error is terribly important in this > case. At the very least, though, you get the best of all worlds: All > handlers execute, exceptions are thrown, and performance isn't > sacrificed. > > --John > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
