On Mar 24, 9:13 pm, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think the order of the error is terribly important in this > case. At the very least, though, you get the best of all worlds: All > handlers execute, exceptions are thrown, and performance isn't > sacrificed. >
That's pretty neat code. But if I have an error in JavaScript then I prefer the code to break where the error is. If I was using a debugger to inspect the stack then I wouldn't be able to debug this because the error has passed. And mentioning performance is a red herring. -dean --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
