@GTG, great question, I second that.
@Jack, if you can explain what you are trying to do with mootools, maybe we
can come up with an alternative.
On 8/22/07, Ganeshji Marwaha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't think there is a way to make mootools play well with other
> libraries when using the infamous "$". jQuery is probably the only library
> that understands this concern and has implemented appropriate precautions in
> its code base.
>
> That said, to look at ur needs from a higher level, i think i will first
> need to understand what is that u r doing with mootools that can't be done
> in jquery. If we are able to easily achieve the same using jQuery, then you
> wont have to use mootools at all in the first place...
>
>
> -GTG
>
>
> On 8/22/07, Jack Killpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Right, I just don't want to touch any of the existing/relevant
> > files....only wrap moo in something that won't conflict. Thanks for poking
> > into it for me, though, much appreciated. Seems like a no-brainer to have in
> > a library (and a reason to use jq over moo in general if it t'aint possible
> > ;-)
> >
> > Benjamin Sterling wrote:
> >
> > I was just looking at some of my plugins and realized that, if your
> > plugins are wrapped like below, doing the noflict should not be a headache.
> >
> > (function($){
> > // original content
> > })(jQuery);
> >
> > Even if you have to wrap your current code (custom code you written) in
> > that, you should still be ok.
> >
> > On 8/22/07, Benjamin Sterling < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry Jack, never ran into the issue. Maybe replacing all the $ in
> > > mootools' core, probably not the best approach, but I could not find an
> > > answer.
> > >
> > > Sorry.
> > >
> > > On 8/22/07, Jack Killpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Right, I know about the no-conflict mode. My issue is the opposite:
> > > > I don't want to touch any existing js files to use jquery in no-conflict
> > > > mode....and haven't had any luck via mootools pleas for a workaround at
> > > > the
> > > > moo level. Hoping someone here has dealt with it. I just have a little
> > > > mootools thing I need to use so don't want to touch other stuff that's
> > > > already working.
> > > >
> > > > Thx.
> > > > Jack
> > > >
> > > > Benjamin Sterling wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Check out
> > > > http://michaelshadle.com/2007/07/03/jquerys-no-conflict-mode-yet-another-reason-why-its-the-best/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/22/07, Jack Killpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a site that's chock-full of jquery stuff: numerous js files
> > > > > using
> > > > > jquery, bunch of plugins, etc. I have a need to use mootools for
> > > > > something that must coexist with the jquery stuff. I know that
> > > > > jquery's
> > > > > $ can be changed to something else, but rather than mod any of my
> > > > > existing js files, I'd prefer to override moo's $ instead.
> > > > > However,
> > > > > haven't been able to find a way to do it. I can't imagine there
> > > > > isn't a
> > > > > way, but so far no luck.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone in this lovely, lively, vigorous jquery group know a
> > > > > workaround?
> > > > >
> > > > > (buttered up enough?)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jack
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Benjamin Sterling
> > > > http://www.KenzoMedia.com <http://www.kenzomedia.com/>
> > > > http://www.KenzoHosting.com <http://www.kenzohosting.com/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Benjamin Sterling
> > > http://www.KenzoMedia.com <http://www.kenzomedia.com/>
> > > http://www.KenzoHosting.com <http://www.kenzohosting.com/>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Benjamin Sterling
> > http://www.KenzoMedia.com <http://www.kenzomedia.com/>
> > http://www.KenzoHosting.com <http://www.kenzohosting.com/>
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Benjamin Sterling
http://www.KenzoMedia.com
http://www.KenzoHosting.com
