CC'ing to dev so our mentors can review...

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Les Hazlewood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Actually, in our Incubator Proposal, section 3.1, we had asked for 4 lists,
> one of which was a user list, the intention of which was to have it from day
> one.  This was publicly available for review by anyone for weeks.  The
> proposal was reviewed extensively and voted upon by the Incubator PMC, and
> no one once said that a user list should be postponed.
>
> I don't know where you've seen arguments to sticking with the dev list for
> now - I've never heard of these, and I'm rather surprised that a user list
> does not yet exist.
>
> I guess what I'm saying is that the Proposal has been voted upon and
> approved - there is no further need to vote internally for a user list.  If
> you want to hold a vote, it should be to reverse what has already been
> approved - that we vote to _not_ set up the already-approved list.
>
> I will vote a hearty -1 for such a proposal.  User lists have nothing to do
> with traffic and have everything to do with routing.  Most end-users don't
> want to be bothered by architecture or implementation internal details.  And
> since we don't have a Forum product in the Incubator infrastructure, there
> is _no_ outlet for end users for communication other than the current dev
> list.  That is not what the dev list is for.  That we already have more user
> subscribers than dev subscribers in our current infrastructure should shed
> to light its importance and reason for provisioning.
>
> My .02
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Jeremy Haile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This has been discussed several times on the incubator list, and has
>> always been left somewhat unanswered.  If we need to hold a vote on it, we
>> can but the current decision and what was in our original proposal was to
>> just have a dev list at the beginning.
>> Alan, based on past experience, recommended not creating a user list until
>> there was enough traffic so as to have a more interesting list to subscribe
>> to and not have a list that's mostly dead.
>>
>> I don't agree with setting one up immediately (i.e. without discussion
>> and/or a vote), especially since there have been arguments for sticking with
>> just the dev list for now.  I don't see why a project should have multiple
>> lists if the traffic on one list is small.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>> On Jul 1, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Jeremy Haile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> No.  There is no [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.  We are not
>>> adding a user list until we have enough traffic on dev to require one.
>>
>>
>> I didn't know there wasn't one yet.  Who determined that "we are not
>> adding a user list until we have enough traffic on dev to require one"?  Is
>> this an Incubator practice?
>>
>> A user list has nothing to do with traffic - it has to do with routing
>> appropriate requests - dev list posts are for the people committing to and
>> contributing to the project.  User list posts are for end users who just
>> want to ask questions or help other end users out.
>>
>> If we don't have a user list set up, I'm cc'ing Alan and Craig - every OS
>> project should have these two lists at a bare minimum...  We have a user
>> list now, with more subscribers on it than the dev list - we need to mirror
>> this in the incubator infrastructure.
>>
>> Alan, Craig? Can we get this set up asap?
>>
>> - Les
>>
>> use the [email protected] list for any questions related
>>> to JSecurity.
>>>
>>> You can find information on our mailing lists and how to subscribe here:
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JSEC/Mailing+Lists
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 1, 2008, at 8:40 AM, Peter Ledbrook wrote:
>>>
>>>  2008/7/1 Les Hazlewood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>
>>>>> P.S.  Also, just a friendly reminder - please use the
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.  We'll be moving away from
>>>>> the
>>>>> codehaus lists shortly!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do we have this yet? I thought we only had "jsecurity-dev" so far?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>
>>>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to