It is just one of the reasons, albeit minor as you point out. Who doesn't prefer a smaller download size/time when possible ;)
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Jeremy Haile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then why does the download size matter that much? i.e. It doesn't seem like > it should be a consideration really when talking about this decision, since > a) it only makes a difference of a few K and b) we already offer a smaller > download without the dependencies. > > I just ask because it keeps being brought up as a reason not to move to > SLF4J. Doesn't seem important to me. > > > On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > > To mitigate the size of the download, you could always distribute a >>> jsecurity.zip and jsecurity-with-dependencies.zip just like Spring does. >>> >> >> >> Heh. You must not have used any of our releases the past 3 months. We do >> this already ;) >> > >
