Ah, I see what he/you were saying now, and yes, I agree with that. My POV is that it is not worth arguing about any more until a *need* surfaces.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> Maybe you didn't read the email thoroughly: >> >> > Alan just said that when you wrote : > > "I will be happy to re-visit this issue if end-users start to complain > about JCL or express a definite *need* for SLF4J..." > > this is your POV, not the community POV. If we decide that we need to move > to SLF4J, as a community, then we will do it, even if users don't complain > about CL issues. If we need a formal vote about it, then let's vote. > > That being said, reverting the code to its previous state before injecting > it to Apache was the best thing to do, IMO. > > Thanks ! > > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
