On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]>wrote:
> Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
>> Shiro still exists as a potential name, I just didn't like it much, so I
>> kept brainstorming :)
>>
>>
> Guys, try to keep in mind that what is important is
> 1) that the name does not conflict with something existing
> 2) that it's short and does not have bad meaning in main languages, and is
> related more or less with the project
> 3) and last, not least, it's a pleasant name.
>
> So far, almost all the proposed names, including Aplsec, fail to pass step
> (1).
that would be AP - L - sec. As in APPLication SECurity - Not a capital I
('eye'). Ap-L-sec passes.
