Aside from the IDE integration, our existing build environment doesn't satisfy your list. But Gradle can be built by pretty much any CI server: http://www.gradle.org/userguide/0.5/userguidech19.html#x57-15300019
Cheers, Les On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]>wrote: > Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >> >> On Dec 26, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >> Les Hazlewood wrote: >>> >>>> Nope, none at all - I was just bringing it up for discussion to see if >>>> people wanted to give it a go. I found it enjoyable and was thinking >>>> others might as well. >>>> >>>> I think that it's better to get close to what people are used to. I >>> would rather favor a move to maven, if we decide to change the build system, >>> as it's more likely to be a build system people know, and it has proved to >>> be stable, reliable and capable of handling quite complex build. >>> >>> Gradle, IMHO, sounds like the last hype... >>> >> >> May not be hype. I've always had the philosophy of letting a thousand >> flowers bloom. It's just that this project just got started. >> > Gradle current version is 0.5, does not have any kind of report (JDepend, > Checkstyle, etc), is not integrated into any IDE, does not generate Idea > project files, is not integrated in any CI we use (Hudson, Continuum). > Enough to call it hype, atm. > > When Gradle will hit a 1.0-RC, fine. Until then, it's just a candidate > aside the real build system we should have. > > > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
