Its not a bad idea. It could be one of those things that they are unlikely to care about unless specifically asked to care, but it would certainly put an end to the discussion.

Tim

On Jan 11, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:

Tim Veil wrote:
I guess my take is that
JSecurity has been in the name of this project for nearly 4 years without compliant
JSecurity has name recognition and a following
The project of concern, "J-Security" is not a product at all but rather a " resource for security information and analysis." J-Security's parent company Juniper is in the network hardware business not the Java application business JSecurity is an open-source software project not a "product" we are looking to sell (not a competitor in any way to Juniper)

Just a suggestion : why don't someone contact Juniper legals and ask if they see JSecurity as an acceptable name for us ? That would close this long thread, I think.

--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to