Foot work to find who is the right person within Juniper? or le...@?
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: > I think there's a lot of foot work that needs to be done to just get us to > find the right person. Find that person and I'll be happy to start the > discussion. I imagine that something might have to be hand held through the > lawyers if we're lucky. > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Jan 11, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> Great idea. But would this be something that one of the folks in >> legal@ would want to formulate? Or should it be one of us 'regular >> joes' just asking a question? I've cc'd Legal to see what they >> recommend.... >> >> Cheers, >> >> Les >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Tim Veil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Its not a bad idea. It could be one of those things that they are >>> unlikely >>> to care about unless specifically asked to care, but it would certainly >>> put >>> an end to the discussion. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> On Jan 11, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >>> >>>> Tim Veil wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I guess my take is that >>>>> JSecurity has been in the name of this project for nearly 4 years >>>>> without >>>>> compliant >>>>> JSecurity has name recognition and a following >>>>> The project of concern, "J-Security" is not a product at all but rather >>>>> a >>>>> " resource for security information and analysis." >>>>> J-Security's parent company Juniper is in the network hardware business >>>>> not the Java application business >>>>> JSecurity is an open-source software project not a "product" we are >>>>> looking to sell (not a competitor in any way to Juniper) >>>> >>>> Just a suggestion : why don't someone contact Juniper legals and ask if >>>> they see JSecurity as an acceptable name for us ? That would close this >>>> long >>>> thread, I think. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> cordialement, regards, >>>> Emmanuel Lécharny >>>> www.iktek.com >>>> directory.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >
