Great idea. But would this be something that one of the folks in legal@ would want to formulate? Or should it be one of us 'regular joes' just asking a question? I've cc'd Legal to see what they recommend....
Cheers, Les On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Tim Veil <[email protected]> wrote: > Its not a bad idea. It could be one of those things that they are unlikely > to care about unless specifically asked to care, but it would certainly put > an end to the discussion. > > Tim > > On Jan 11, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > >> Tim Veil wrote: >>> >>> I guess my take is that >>> JSecurity has been in the name of this project for nearly 4 years without >>> compliant >>> JSecurity has name recognition and a following >>> The project of concern, "J-Security" is not a product at all but rather a >>> " resource for security information and analysis." >>> J-Security's parent company Juniper is in the network hardware business >>> not the Java application business >>> JSecurity is an open-source software project not a "product" we are >>> looking to sell (not a competitor in any way to Juniper) >> >> Just a suggestion : why don't someone contact Juniper legals and ask if >> they see JSecurity as an acceptable name for us ? That would close this long >> thread, I think. >> >> -- >> -- >> cordialement, regards, >> Emmanuel Lécharny >> www.iktek.com >> directory.apache.org >> >> > >
