Hi Emmanuel, Thanks very much for the feedback - I appreciate it a lot. I'll adjust accordingly and re-notify so we can review again.
> 1) About the name, I would suggest we just keep the matter open, as more > IPMC members are stepping in. Right now, the vote is closed and the result > is not positive, but (1) I don't think it was a good idea to vote such an > item [1] and (2) I'm not sure I won't cast my vote in another direction if > Juniper is not considered as a risk or if Juniper legals just let us using > JSecurity. Gotcha. I'll revise that section to say it is still open at the moment. > 2) You have to mention that Alex Karasulu has stepped down as a mentor. Ah yes, thanks. I'll add that as well. > Otherwise, it's a pretty good report. We have one more day for other > comments. > > [1] The reason I think it was not a good idea to vote is that if we are not > trying to solve an issue, but to determinate if there is an IP issue. No > matter if you get all the -1 needed to keep JSecurity name, you may still be > forced to change the name if The ASF get sued and lose. Sounds good. It is very helpful to learn when would be a good time to vote vs when to let discussion continue. This was a great learning experience for me, and is one of the great things the Incubator affords us. Thanks :) Best, Les
