"3 of the 5 project mentors ..." should read "Three of four project
mentors ..."
You neglected to mention that we would have both ant and maven build
systems in place.
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 11, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
I just updated the report - please lemme know if that is OK.
Thanks again,
Les
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Les Hazlewood
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Thanks very much for the feedback - I appreciate it a lot. I'll
adjust accordingly and re-notify so we can review again.
1) About the name, I would suggest we just keep the matter open,
as more
IPMC members are stepping in. Right now, the vote is closed and
the result
is not positive, but (1) I don't think it was a good idea to vote
such an
item [1] and (2) I'm not sure I won't cast my vote in another
direction if
Juniper is not considered as a risk or if Juniper legals just let
us using
JSecurity.
Gotcha. I'll revise that section to say it is still open at the
moment.
2) You have to mention that Alex Karasulu has stepped down as a
mentor.
Ah yes, thanks. I'll add that as well.
Otherwise, it's a pretty good report. We have one more day for other
comments.
[1] The reason I think it was not a good idea to vote is that if
we are not
trying to solve an issue, but to determinate if there is an IP
issue. No
matter if you get all the -1 needed to keep JSecurity name, you
may still be
forced to change the name if The ASF get sued and lose.
Sounds good. It is very helpful to learn when would be a good time
to
vote vs when to let discussion continue. This was a great learning
experience for me, and is one of the great things the Incubator
affords us. Thanks :)
Best,
Les
