Cool. Does that mean all the package refactoring is finished Alan? On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Apache Hudson Server < [email protected]> wrote:
> See > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/JSecurity%20-%20ant/38/changes > > >
- Build failed in Hudson: JSecurity - ant #29 Apache Hudson Server
- Build failed in Hudson: JSecurity - ant #30 Apache Hudson Server
- Build failed in Hudson: JSecurity - ant #31 Apache Hudson Server
- Build failed in Hudson: JSecurity - ant #32 Apache Hudson Server
- Build failed in Hudson: JSecurity - ant #33 Apache Hudson Server
- Build failed in Hudson: JSecurity - ant #34 Apache Hudson Server
- Build failed in Hudson: JSecurity - ant #35 Apache Hudson Server
- Build failed in Hudson: JSecurity - ant #36 Apache Hudson Server
- Build failed in Hudson: JSecurity - ant #37 Apache Hudson Server
- Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #38 Apache Hudson Server
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Les Hazlewood
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Alan D. Cabrera
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Les Hazlewood
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Alan D. Cabrera
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Daniel J. Lauk
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Les Hazlewood
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Alan D. Cabrera
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Emmanuel Lecharny
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Erik Beeson
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Alan D. Cabrera
- Re: Hudson build is back to normal: JSecurity - ant #... Les Hazlewood
