If I may add my two cents... > I have no issues with that. But why not org.apache.ki.samples.*? I'm just > curious...
I don't know about Alan's intentions, but I think it would make it easier for new users to distinguish where the sample application ends and where Ki begins. Never the less, I'd rather go for "com.example" or "org.example" (instead of com.acme), as IIRC these domain names are reserved by some RFCs. Best regards, DJ > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>wrote: > >> There's one or two samples that still need to be converted. I think I'll >> have time to finish up tonight. >> >> I have one comment/question. I'm thinking that it might be a good idea to >> have samples go into a separate package space other than org.apache.ki. >> This makes it crazy obvious as to what are example packages and what >> packages are part of the project space. I was thinking of something like >> com.acme.sample... WDYT? >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> >> On Mar 11, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >> >> Cool. Does that mean all the package refactoring is finished Alan? >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Apache Hudson Server < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> See >>>> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/JSecurity%20-%20ant/38/changes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >
