Sounds good to me - I agree that it is nice to see the distinction in the package prefix.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Daniel J. Lauk <[email protected]>wrote: > If I may add my two cents... > > > I have no issues with that. But why not org.apache.ki.samples.*? I'm > just > > curious... > > I don't know about Alan's intentions, but I think it would make it > easier for new users to distinguish where the sample application ends > and where Ki begins. > > Never the less, I'd rather go for "com.example" or "org.example" > (instead of com.acme), as IIRC these domain names are reserved by some > RFCs. > > Best regards, > DJ > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> There's one or two samples that still need to be converted. I think > I'll > >> have time to finish up tonight. > >> > >> I have one comment/question. I'm thinking that it might be a good idea > to > >> have samples go into a separate package space other than org.apache.ki. > >> This makes it crazy obvious as to what are example packages and what > >> packages are part of the project space. I was thinking of something > like > >> com.acme.sample... WDYT? > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Alan > >> > >> > >> On Mar 11, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> > >> Cool. Does that mean all the package refactoring is finished Alan? > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Apache Hudson Server < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> See > >>>> > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/JSecurity%20-%20ant/38/changes > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > >
