I removed the Ant build files because I was fairly certain that there was consensus to move to Maven going forward. Those not too particular to Maven didn't mind so much since our build is a relatively simple one and we don't need any 'crazy' Maven customization.
On the IntelliJ files: I *thought* I did not commit their removal, going so far as to tell my IDE to ignore them from showing up in the file list completely. If they are completely removed from the project, that was not my intention at all and would have been due to my error. If that happened I apologize. Jeremy or Tim, can you please run mvn idea:idea and tell me if that is to your liking? If so, we can just generate those and commit them to SVN pending final group consensus as to whether or not they should be in RCS... On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> Where did the Ant build files go? Where are the IntelliJ files? >>> >> >> >> (I know nothing but) I thought the idea was to move to Maven. IDE project >> files for IntelliJ, Eclipse etc. can be generated via Maven. You can use >> "mvn idea:idea" to generate the project files for IDEA ( >> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-idea-plugin/), but I think the >> newest >> version has a pretty good support for Maven built-in. >> > > There was tremendous push back on getting rid of the IDEA files that were > checked in and, so, we need to collect a community consensus before we > remove them; don't get me wrong I want to get rid of them and I think, like > you, that they are superfluous. > > > Regards, > Alan > > > > > >> >> Kalle >> >> >> On Mar 24, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >> >>> >>> All finished. The only thing not enabled at the moment is the 'sprhib' >>> >>>> Spring Hibernate sample application. Some dependencies need to be added >>>> to >>>> that and perhaps some Jetty config. But overall things should be >>>> working >>>> fine now. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Les >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected] >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'm going to tackle moving the build structure to be Maven compliant now >>>> >>>>> - >>>>> proper directory trees, etc. I need to do some testing today that is >>>>> important to my project at work and I can't really do that until the ki >>>>> codebase is in a coherent state. Please let me know now if you have >>>>> any >>>>> objections to this (I don't think there would be any - we've discussed >>>>> this >>>>> in the past and there hasn't been any activity in SVN for a while now). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Les >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >
