I've been thinking about that. I've responded to the poster about our name 'Ki', and have not received any feedback. I think it is perfectly fine to retain the name 'Ki'. In any event, just calling it 'Apache Ki' as the official name should be very clear that we're not involved in Stocks-related software...
And yes, I know I can't deploy snapshots yet - I was just preparing so when we are allowed to, we can just 'flip the switch' so to speak. Cheers, Les On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>wrote: > Just a reminder, you cannot deploy snapshots until we get our name > straightened out. > > > Regards, > Alan > > > On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > > Oh wow - I had no idea they had Nexus up and running yet. I knew they >> were >> talking about setting it up on the infrastructure list, but I didn't know >> how far they had gotten. Sweet! >> >> Thanks very much for the update. I love Nexus (use it at work), so this >> will be a nice change. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Les >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Kalle Korhonen >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> Hey Les, >>> >>> AFAIK, the new Apache snapshot repo is at >>> http://repository.apache.org/snapshots (a Nexus instance), deploying >>> snapshots to people.apache.org is deprecated. More information at >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1896. >>> >>> Kalle >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected] >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> Quick question for the Mentors (or anyone that might know): >>>> >>>> Now that we have a standard Maven build, how do I deploy snapshots to >>>> the >>>> people.apache.org locations? I don't see any <deploymentManagement> >>>> information listed here: http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Les >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected] >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>> All finished. The only thing not enabled at the moment is the 'sprhib' >>>>> Spring Hibernate sample application. Some dependencies need to be >>>>> >>>> added >>> >>>> to >>>> >>>>> that and perhaps some Jetty config. But overall things should be >>>>> >>>> working >>> >>>> fine now. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Les >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm going to tackle moving the build structure to be Maven compliant >>>>>> >>>>> now >>> >>>> - >>>> >>>>> proper directory trees, etc. I need to do some testing today that is >>>>>> important to my project at work and I can't really do that until the >>>>>> >>>>> ki >>> >>>> codebase is in a coherent state. Please let me know now if you have >>>>>> >>>>> any >>> >>>> objections to this (I don't think there would be any - we've discussed >>>>>> >>>>> this >>>> >>>>> in the past and there hasn't been any activity in SVN for a while >>>>>> >>>>> now). >>> >>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Les >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
