> > The goal of the list is *not* to blame c.l.js or the major Javascript > libraries. From c.l.js I have learned a lot of things from professional > developers. Although there are some trollish posts, there is and really > valuable information. How someone would interpret this information > depends on his opinion and his attitude. >
Thanks for being clear on this Asen. I wasn't thinking this was the purpose of JSMentors. Some people do not like to be target of criticisms. This really depends on > the criticisms and on the critics. When the criticism is constructive and > says some things which can improve your knowledge and especially your code > it is really good for you (I know you agree with this statement). The > problem is that some people do not skip invaluable criticisms and > start to reply of trollish posts. While they do not skip the troll's > criticism, they completely skip the constructive criticism. They think all > of the critics are trolls, which does not help them a lot. Good point, I will have a more critical eye on what I view on c.l.js to separate the good stuff from the trolling stuff. This was a good reminder to me. -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
