On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Asen Bozhilov <[email protected]>wrote:
> Third parties tool are not good for me. The posted code there can be > expired and this will break consistency of the discussion. I do not > think someone should post ton of code. If he post only the relevant > part it can be easy for the members of group to read and give relevant > responses. > I agree this is a concern, but I think that in this case it is not very likely. jsfiddle has become a defacto standard of at least two very large libraries (mootools and JQ). As such, it is not very likely it will "run out of resources". We always have to choose how we create our technological dependencies, but we also need to be able to use advancements as they come. Looking back at the last 20 posts, at least 4-5 of them had very long pieces of code in them, that required me to copy-paste them to an external editor to dive deeper into them. IMO that by itself suggests that a better tool is required. -- Arieh Glazer http://www.arieh.co.il http://www.link-wd.co.il -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
