On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 22:49, אריה גלזר <[email protected]> wrote:
> jsfiddle has become a defacto standard of at least two very large libraries > (mootools and JQ). > I think it's quite different : it's not really useful to see some code using an old javascript library. A jQuery / Mootools sample posted on jsFiddle will probably be accessed during several months but in few years it won't really matter that the sample is broken or not because the code will probably be obsolete. But in this mailing list we are talking about javascript and its evolution is quite slow so code samples will be useful in several years. Sometimes we don't need to run the code to talk about it or debug it, a simple reading is enough. Sometimes code is complicated or behaviour is meaningless and need to be run in a real environment to be understood. So I think the good practice should be to use both methods : here's my main function / code sample and here's a link to run it in jsFiddle. In addition, I think that someone needing help or advice should probably accept to create a jsFiddle snippets if you just ask him. -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
