On 11.02.2011 17:51, Chris Heilmann wrote:
On 11/02/2011 14:35, Peter van der Zee wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Adrian Olaru <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'm just wondering, why don't we have by now a Lua alternative to
JavaScript in the browsers?
Shouldn't the question by "why do we need an alternative"? We tried
Java in the browser - that didn't work.
I think the answer is simple -- someone knows Lua (Python/Ruby/etc)
better than JS and wants to user Lua. Someone thinks that Coffee is more
elegant than JS -- and want to use Coffee. That's why there always
should be alternatives.
Dmitry.
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
