A language being static/dynamic isn't very relevant. Don't let crusty languages like Java ruin your impression of type systems.
On Feb 11, 8:56 am, Adrian Olaru <[email protected]> wrote: > I think an alternative is always a good idea. Java is big, > is statically typed and it wasn't actually made for scripting. It was a bad > idea from the start imho. Lua, on the other hand, is small, embeddable, > fast, dynamic and it actually proved that it can work as > an embeddable scripting language. -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
