A comment from /be on Lua: http://brendaneich.com/2006/02/python-and-javascript/#comment-435
On Feb 11, 9:18 am, Adrian Olaru <[email protected]> wrote: > Right now, JavaScript is the way to go. My opinion is that programmers love > having more choices. Like on the server we are using Python Ruby or even > JavaScript nowadays. But what we've got on the client? Only JavaScript. We > had a lot of opportunities to "fix" the language but we stopped having > another option to the language. I love programming in JavaScript. Don't get > me wrong. I'm just saying that having other scripting languages as an option > is not such a bad thing. > > btw, Lua is small, like 202KB small, tarred and gzipped. :) I am giving Lua > as an example because it has similar features as JS and I think JS > programmers will not have any difficulties coding in Lua right away. Except > maybe for that table offset Peter was talking about. :) -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
