I'm not saying that just because Google does something it makes it ok.
I'm just hoping that as developers we don't become so dogmatic in our
approach that we forget to ask "why." 10 years ago it was safe to say
that progressive enhancement was the best development strategy for
every developer and every project. It certainly still is the best
appoarch if I'm creating a blog or targeting the enterprise market.
However, the web is becoming SO MUCH more than just a collection of
documents and hyperlinks. If the core of a given development project
is a rich application-style experience, it doesn't make the developer
more ignorant for requiring javascript. At that point it's a HR/budget
discussion -- "will adding $x amount of time to support a static
experience result in $y financial return." I'm just giving the
developers at Google and Twitter the benefit of the doubt that they
have had that discussion, and the final decision was not a matter of
"willful ignorance" on their part.

-- 
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to