On Dec 31 2011, 10:17 pm, Stefan Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2011-12-31 20:29, Daniel wrote: > > > There's nothing ignorant about the choices that Google makes with Dunning kruger effect in full force!
You're right because you say so? I and others have engaged in public assessment of a lot of code, including a lot of Google code, on comp.lang.javascript. Search the archives. > > their web software. They are a major corporation, and you can be Appeal to Corporate Authority? Too big to make a mistake? Only small businesses can make mistakes? > > assured that all their decisions come down to money and supporting > > their bottom line. They must have done the market research and > > concluded that they wouldn't see enough financial return to make it > > worth ensuring their web services work perfectly for users who turn > > off JavaScript. My gut says they are right. > > No offense to your gut, but even Google's web developers are made of > flesh and blood. They have made mistakes in the past, and they'll make > mistakes in the future, just like the rest of us. I'd prefer to keep > this discussion on a technical level instead of appealing to authority. > Right. What difference does it make how big Google is? None. The code is what it is. -- Garrett Twitter: @xkit personx.tumblr.com -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
