Must be JDBC driver then or I am sure there is something in the original spec
that says a JDBC 1.0 driver may not implement the String parameter
version so that it work out of sequence.
--
Peter Pilgrim
G.O.A.T
"the Greatest Of All Time"
---------------------------------------- Message History
----------------------------------------
From: sandarbh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@java.sun.com> on 21/02/2001 14:20
Please respond to A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and
reference <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DELEGATED - Sent by: A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Sequence Problem
if we use column index it does not give a problem but then same should apply
for field index. why not??
sandarbh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Pilgrim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: Sequence Problem
> Why don't you use the column index
>
> rst.getString(1);
> rst.getString(2);
> rst.getString(3);
>
> then it doesn't matter how you permutate ....
>
> rst.getString(3);
> rst.getString(1);
> rst.getString(2);
>
> --
--<CUT>--
--
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender
immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or
distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
For digest: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "set JSP-INTEREST DIGEST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
