It's really a code maturity issue - we're using this one because it
works and doesn't have any major issues...
/Janne
On 20 Oct 2007, at 05:01, Murray Altheim wrote:
Janne,
Since you suggested using OSCache for what I'm now calling a
TransferCache, I've been looking into it and coding frenzy has
set in. Certainly more complicated than using a Hashtable, but
interesting, and likely a good tool to learn to use. If I
remember correctly, you'd suggested I use OSCache for something
else awhile ago, can't remember now.
Is there a reason why prior to 2.6.x we wouldn't want to upgrade
from 2.3.1 to the most recent version (three versions forward,
at 2.4.1)? Have there been significant API changes? From a
cursory look over the ChangeLogs (why can't they simply be in a
text file?), I didn't see any major changes.
Thanks,
Murray
......................................................................
.....
Murray Altheim <murray07 at altheim.com>
=== = =
http://www.altheim.com/murray/
= = ===
SGML Grease Monkey, Banjo Player, Wantanabe Zen Monk
= = = =
Boundless wind and moon - the eye within eyes,
Inexhaustible heaven and earth - the light beyond light,
The willow dark, the flower bright - ten thousand houses,
Knock at any door - there's one who will respond.
-- The Blue Cliff Record
