-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I quickly looked over those addresses. Just dialup ranges. Maybe we could use something like the abusive hosts blocking list[1] to identify the evil ones?
[1] http://www.ahbl.org/ Christoph Sauer wrote: > No, not the same subnet. Here's a list I collected... > > <Valve className="org.apache.catalina.valves.RemoteAddrValve" > allow="" deny="60.10.6.170, 60.32.219.68, 60.190.243.173, > 60.190.240.76, i61.57.40.31, 66.46.148.201, 74.231.24.2, 80.71.135.2, > i81.201.58.55, 83.236.135.140, 87.3.58.149, 122.214.180.254, 122.252.226.40, > 161.200.255.162, 200.226.134.53, 201.12.178.33, 202.70.201.34, > 203.69.39.251, 207.248.164, 207.248.164.199, 210.17.247.39, 210.73.88.144, > 216.32.162.164, 211.7.138.14, 217.149.193.70, 218.58.136.4, 222.221.6.144, > 222.190.96.196"/> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Fabian Haupt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008 10:28 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: The guy's back... > > Just a thought, but maybe he's using something like TOR? Are the IP > addresses completely unrelated or more or less in the same subnet? If he > just redialed his line, i figure they would. > > A thing we thought of as possibility to defend those, would be to allow > tor-edits just through some captchas. So we wouldn't have to shut out > tor-users completely, but had some control over spammers (assumed he > really is using tor). > > But that's just something we came up for the wikipedia-vs-tor problem. > > Greets > Fabian > > Janne Jalkanen wrote: >>> Not sure if that's any help, but there'd be no counter to it unless >>> the jerk was willing to edit a single page every ten minutes or so in >>> some fashion that we couldn't identify as sub-human. >> Spambots already do this. Here are the modification dates from the last >> ten attempts by this guy. Each and everyone from a different IP address. > >> 2008-01-02 08:56:27 >> 2008-01-02 13:36:48 >> 2008-01-02 14:20:05 >> 2008-01-02 15:46:48 >> 2008-01-02 15:47:45 >> 2008-01-02 23:54:31 >> 2008-01-03 00:18:08 >> 2008-01-03 00:37:03 >> 2008-01-03 01:47:51 >> 2008-01-03 06:49:43 > >> /Janne > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkd8tQsACgkQtC//DIQj2V8hzQCcCMMlqZi7UKgGTZKjpStiPE8J lK0AoJX97BfMveOegUbkhy4FAVRo5qiA =k2GV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
