Yeah, well I'm still scrubbing 2.6.2. You're making my head spin. I think we're churning out new code and new features much faster than users can really assimilate it. I'd like things to settle down more between versions if we want production-quality code that's not largely obsolete (and unsupported) by the time it's deployed.
Just my $0.02 On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 14:43 +0300, Janne Jalkanen wrote: > BTW, I think that 2.8 is ripe for an alpha release. Any objections > if we start the alpha/beta cycle for 2.8 now? That way we would have > something for people to test and mature. > > /Janne
