Hi all,

let me simply copy&paste my former post from the private list here and then 
pick up some points from the further discussion on the dev list:

Our community likes the 2.8 series for its stability and simplicity. Therefore, 
maintaining the 2.8 branch at least for a longer while is something that really 
makes sense.
Another fact is that the key developers of 3.0 are very busy with other things, 
which means that it's quite hard to tell when it will be possible to release a 
stable 3.0.
However, the current plan still is to graduate with a 3.0 alpha and retire 2.8 
as soon as possible. Quite obviously this isn't likely to work.
This is why I think it makes sense to proceed in smaller steps (but proceed!) 
and so I've been wondering whether there are any objections to making version 
2.8.5 an Apache release.
As far as I can see, most of the required changes (e.g. rewrite of PageRenamer 
and IndexPlugin) are part of the 2.8 branch already. Some things aren't though, 
e.g. the package name change (is this required?) and removal of author tags in 
the source code.

So, looking at the discussion so far, I'm happy to see that we still do have a 
stable community. Also, our mentor is still believing that graduation can 
succeed. Therefore, it still makes sense to graduate.

@Janne: Thinking of your personal situation, I can fully understand your 
proposal to move over to GitHub. JSPWiki is your baby, and so you've always 
been seen as the natural project leader - of course associated with all of the 
corresponding work. From the current point of view, it'd be the least 
time-consuming solution to move over to GitHub. But, we've all been putting so 
much effort in the incubation process, it'd be a pity if this became worthless 
just because the last steps are hard to go. I, for one, am not thinking of 
GitHub as an alternative to Apache in every aspect.

Look at the Apache Roller project. They have similar problems:
* mature project
* small number of committers who have little time
And: They succeed. It's a healthy project which users and developers can trust 
in.

I think it was our mentor who said that it'd be always up to the project how 
fast it wants to proceed. So, the recent slowdown is nothing that should be 
scaring us.

Regarding graduation with a 2.8, I think there are mainly organizational, 
infrastructure and smaller code maintenance tasks left.

So, assumed that there are quite some people left willing to finish graduation, 
I'd be willing to take charge of the related tasks.
However, I'm no JSPWiki 3.0 architect like Janne or Andrew, so I won't be able 
to take parts related to this category at least in the medium term.

Regards
 Florian

Reply via email to