I would like this thread to be dedicated to uddi v 3.0 discussion. Regarding, inclusion of daffodil db scripts in juddi, I do not see any problems including it in juddi distribution, as a contribution, just the way we have db scripts for other databases.
--- "Manoj Kr. Sheoran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Steve and all the community, > > As I asked to community for the support of a RDBMS > as juddi repository but > no reply from any side. I 've done all the > implementation work to make > DaffodilDB/One$DB as juddi compliance and keen give > all the work done by me > for juddi+DaffodilDB/One$DB to juddi community. > What's your opinion for > above? > > > Regards, > Manoj > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anil Saldhana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:20 PM > Subject: UDDI v 3.0 > > > > Steve and all, > > are we thinking about implementing UDDI v 3.0? > If > > not, may be time to start the design discussion, > plus > > getting community involvement in the design > process. > > > > A service registry is key in any SOA strategy. > > > > cheers, > > Anil > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in > one click. > > http://farechase.yahoo.com > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
