|
Steve and All,
Thanks for concern!
>Manoj, before I add these scripts we need to know specifically what you
mean by 'script >changes'.
Only syntax changes i.e.
DaffodilDB/One$DB does support specification like .... (TEMPID INT NULL)
then I removed NULL from script. Changed sysdate like functions to daffodildb
compatible syntanx.
All the integrities are same as they were before
and no changes at the database level but just make it compatible to run on
DaffodilDB Browser / Shell or by JDBC / ODBC / PHP etc.
Feel free to fire as more as questions.
Regards,
Manoj
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 12:36
AM
Subject: Re: UDDI v 3.0
Manoj, before I add these scripts we need to know specifically what you
mean by 'script changes'.
Steve
On 11/4/05, Manoj Kr.
Sheoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi
Anil and All,
I agree with your view point but there need to make some
changes at script
level due to some syntax for DaffodilDB/One$DB and for
the same I've made
changes.
My intension is to put it in the list
of juddi supported database at the
juddi home page as others are there
and provide the link of enclosed
database scripts.
If required, I
will elaborate more about the DataSource specific classes
for
DaffodilDB/One$DB.
One$DB is opensource version of
DaffodilDB.
Please let me know, What's opinion you people have for
the above?
Regards,
Manoj
----- Original Message
-----
From: "Anil Saldhana" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
<[email protected]>
Sent:
Saturday, November 05, 2005 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: UDDI v
3.0
> I would like this thread to be dedicated to uddi v
3.0
> discussion.
>
> Regarding, inclusion of daffodil db
scripts in juddi,
> I do not see any problems including it in
juddi
> distribution, as a contribution, just the way we have
>
db scripts for other databases.
>
>
> --- "Manoj Kr.
Sheoran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Steve and all
the community,
> >
> > As I asked to community for the
support of a RDBMS
> > as juddi repository but
> > no
reply from any side. I 've done all the
> >
implementation work to make
> > DaffodilDB/One$DB as juddi
compliance and keen give
> > all the work done by me
> >
for juddi+DaffodilDB/One$DB to juddi community.
> >
What's your opinion for
> > above?
> >
>
>
> > Regards,
> > Manoj
> >
> >
----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anil Saldhana" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> To: <[email protected]>
>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:20 PM
> > Subject: UDDI
v 3.0
> >
> >
> > > Steve and all,
>
> > are we thinking about implementing UDDI v
3.0?
> > If
> > > not, may be time to start the design
discussion,
> > plus
> > > getting community
involvement in the design
> > process.
> > >
>
> > A service registry is key in any SOA strategy.
> >
>
> > > cheers,
> > > Anil
> >
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
__________________________________
> > > Yahoo! FareChase:
Search multiple travel sites in
> > one click.
> > > http://farechase.yahoo.com
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine
Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
|
