|
Dear Steve,
Have we made any process on this task
further?
Regards,
Manoj
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 8:43
AM
Subject: Re: UDDI v 3.0
MAnoj, DDL changes are fine ... I just wanted to be sure there
weren't any changes on the Java side.
Steve
On 11/9/05, Manoj Kr.
Sheoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Steve and All,
Thanks for concern!
>Manoj, before I add these scripts we need to know specifically what
you mean by 'script >changes'.
Only syntax changes i.e.
DaffodilDB/One$DB does support specification like .... (TEMPID INT
NULL) then I removed NULL from script. Changed sysdate like functions to
daffodildb compatible syntanx.
All the integrities are same as they were
before and no changes at the database level but just make it compatible to
run on DaffodilDB Browser / Shell or by JDBC / ODBC / PHP etc.
Feel free to fire as more as questions.
Regards,
Manoj
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005
12:36 AM
Subject: Re: UDDI v 3.0
Manoj, before I add these scripts we need to know specifically what
you mean by 'script changes'.
Steve
On 11/4/05, Manoj
Kr. Sheoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Hi
Anil and All,
I agree with your view point but there need to make
some changes at script
level due to some syntax for DaffodilDB/One$DB
and for the same I've made
changes.
My intension is to put it
in the list of juddi supported database at the
juddi home page as
others are there and provide the link of enclosed
database
scripts.
If required, I will elaborate more about the
DataSource specific classes
for DaffodilDB/One$DB.
One$DB is
opensource version of DaffodilDB.
Please let me know, What's
opinion you people have for the
above?
Regards,
Manoj
----- Original Message
-----
From: "Anil Saldhana" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005
5:03 AM
Subject: Re: UDDI v 3.0
> I would like this
thread to be dedicated to uddi v 3.0
> discussion.
>
>
Regarding, inclusion of daffodil db scripts in juddi,
> I do not
see any problems including it in juddi
> distribution, as a
contribution, just the way we have
> db scripts for other
databases.
>
>
> --- "Manoj Kr. Sheoran" < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
>
wrote:
>
> > Dear Steve and all the community,
> >
> > As I asked to community for the support of a
RDBMS
> > as juddi repository but
> > no reply from
any side. I 've done all the
> > implementation
work to make
> > DaffodilDB/One$DB as juddi compliance and keen
give
> > all the work done by me
> > for
juddi+DaffodilDB/One$DB to juddi community.
> >
What's your opinion for
> > above?
>
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Manoj
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anil
Saldhana" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent:
Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:20 PM
> > Subject: UDDI v
3.0
> >
> >
> > > Steve and all,
>
> > are we thinking about implementing UDDI
v 3.0?
> > If
> > > not, may be time to start the
design discussion,
> > plus
> > > getting
community involvement in the design
> > process.
> >
>
> > > A service registry is key in any SOA
strategy.
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > >
Anil
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> __________________________________
> > > Yahoo!
FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in
> > one click.
> > > http://farechase.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine
Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
|
