Well, its like what Mike said. IntelliJ does literally *everything* I
need done, and does it very nicely. I don't need all the plugins, as
its out of the box functionality covers it all.
I do use jEdit also, from time to time, and adding many of its plugins
make it a very nice "IDE".
As for the point about Eclipses Ant integratrion being nice, I must take
exception. Eclipse has the worst Ant integration of any of the IDE's I
have played with (and I evaluated all the major ones for the Ant book).
Double-clicking errors in an Ant build in Eclipse does nothing -
don't you want to jump to the line of code with an error? Granted,
Eclipse does things a bit differently, and puts compile errors in Tasks
already for you, so its not truly needed, but....
I'm not against Eclipse at all. I'm all for it. I just happen to enjoy
IntelliJ very much and I work for a place that will pay for it.
Erik
Thomas Hicks wrote:
> Hmmm...I find it hard to be convinced by arguments
> like this: it's not as extensible and it costs money...but
> it rocks!
> -tom
>
> At 11:13 AM 7/18/2002 -0700, Erik wrote:
>
>> Nope.
>> But it rocks!
>>
>> Mike Oliver wrote:
>>
>>> Is IntelliJ as modular and extensible as Eclipse?
>>> O
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
