<humor>and by "authorities" do you mean the DOL or DOJ or JUGPD?</humor>
Michael Oliver CTO Alarius Systems LLC 6800 E. Lake Mead Blvd, #1096 Las Vegas, NV 89156 Phone:(702)866-9034 Cell:(518)378-6154 Fax:(702)974-0341 -----Original Message----- From: josh zeidner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:23 PM To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo Thanks, Jon. Your sentence fragment has been noted by the authorities. -jmz --- Jon Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i wish we could get an opinion out of this group > > On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:16 AM, josh zeidner wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, very entertaining. > > > > Although the actual laws and guidelines that > govern > > these issues remain to be seen( in this thread ), > I > > do find that fostering an environment of informal > > discussion etc. provides an excellent cover for > > industry jackasses to effect the community in very > > negative ways. > > > > Back to the original question: Does Sun manage > these > > problems? JCP? or the local community members? > > > > thanks, jmz > > > > --- Michael Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > >> Attention Attention, anyone reading this message > >> without the intent of > >> evaluating the javaness of it please disregard. > >> > >> Michael Oliver > >> CTO > >> Alarius Systems LLC > >> 6800 E. Lake Mead Blvd, #1096 > >> Las Vegas, NV 89156 > >> Phone:(702)866-9034 > >> Cell:(518)378-6154 > >> Fax:(702)974-0341 > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Art Gramlich > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:49 AM > >> To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org > >> Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and > Yahoo > >> > >> Sorry Mr. Zeidner, informal developer-related > >> commentary is indeed > >> inappropriate content for a USERS GROUP. > >> In fact, I have seen on this list that at certain > >> JUG meetings, > >> discussion on non-Java technologies have been > >> discussed. > >> Everyone needs to get back to working on > corporate > >> project #101 > >> immediately. And make sure it's written in > Java(tm). > >> > >> > >> I'll go back to lurking again. > >> > >> Art > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:36 AM, josh zeidner wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> I guess its some kind of coincidence that I am > >>> noticing a high degree of informal commentary on > >> UG > >>> lists lately. You do realize that this kind of > >> thing > >>> reflects badly on customer and employer appeal? > >>> > >>> For instance, I could say some kind of offhand > >>> comment like "they'll give a greencard to just > >> about > >>> any slob who scraped up enough money to bribe > the > >>> DOL!". Obviously, some may be deeply offended > by > >> such > >>> a statement. > >>> > >>> Although it is certainly the prerogative of a > >> group > >>> to govern themselves the way they see fit, in > the > >> case > >>> of a JUG, there is the issue of the exploitation > >> of > >>> the legitimacy that the JUG term provides. I'm > >>> wondering if there are any regulations that deal > >> with > >>> this issue in the JCP or whether the JUG term is > >> an > >>> entirely public-domain all-purpose term that can > >> be > >>> utilized by any party. I would assume that if > >> there > >>> are no such regulations then either 1) JUGs will > >>> likely degrade in relevance( a process already > in > >>> effect ), 2) such regulations will be imposed in > >> the > >>> future. The problems of such exploitation > extend > >> to > >>> all members of a local area. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Josh Zeidner > >>> > >>> > >>> --- Nick Lesiecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> To Tim and Jon: > >>>> > >>>> I nearly fell out of my freaking chair at > "White > >> and > >>>> Nerdy". > >>>> > >>>> To the rest of you: > >>>> If you haven't seen it, it's a must see. > >>>> > >>>> Back to Tim: > >>>> > >>>> Even Google hasn't solved the problem of how to > >>>> migrate all of your > >>>> friends and relatives from your old address. > >>>> Besides, this way I can > >>>> spy on their new UI! > >>>> > >>>> FWIW: I couldn't survive without GMail for my > >> work > >>>> account. Only > >>>> Gmail can handle the volume of internal mail I > >> get. > >>>> > >>>> Back to the group: > >>>> > >>>> Oh, and anyone who's in the area for Hackday's > >>>> welcome to come and > >>>> visit the 'plex. Dunno what Yahoo has planned > for > >>>> HackDay, but I > >>>> guarantee our cafe food is better on the > average > >>>> Tuesday than it is > >>>> at Yahoo's special event. > >>>> > >>>> That's right. I went there. > >>>> > >>>> Nick > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sep 19, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Tim Colson > >> ((tcolson)) > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Lol... am I the only one laughing that Nick > sent > >>>> this from his > >>>>> yahoo.com > >>>>> email? > >>>>> > >>>>> Hojillion -- "number of hos you can fit in > your > >>>> car" ... hmm, in my > >>>>> two-seater that'd only be one and she'd have > to > >>>> sit on the wife's > >>>>> lap...which would most likely end badly. > <grin> > >>>>> > >>>>> It's too bad GOOG doesn't seem to have a > remote > >>>> worker option... or > >>>>> > >>>>> FYI... I'll be at the Yahoo Open Hack Day > >>>> (hackday.org) in the Bay > >>>>> Area > >>>>> next weekend. Anybody else going to be there? > >>>>> > >>>>> Nick? Or are you too "white and nerdy"? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7939447080926152362&q=white > >>>> > >>>>> +and+ > >>>>> nerdy > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
