Brent Verner wrote:
whoo-freakin-hoo!!!! I've done it! Sorry, I just had to
share the excitement with someone,
I totally empathize. I've spent all evening trying to get RMI to work using a naming provider other than the stock rmiregistry that ships with the JDK. And after many hours of dead-ends and wasted time, it's finally working.
And in case anybody is wondering "why isn't rmiregistry good enough?" Tthe main reason I wanted something else is because you can only bind to rmiregistry from the machine where rmiregistry is running. So you can't have one central registry with remote objects from disparate machines registered into it. To do that, you have to use another naming provider. Either that, or run rmiregistry on every machine that hosts remote objects, and then use yet another mechanism (a meta-directory?) to lookup the various rmiregistrys to go lookup the actual stubs.
> because my computer seems > a bit unimpressed :-P
Mine too. Even my room-mate's cat doesn't seem to care. She just sits there looking at me with that "Dumbass, I could have had that working hours ago" look.
TTYL,
Phil -- North Carolina - First In Freedom
Free America - Vote Libertarian www.lp.org
_______________________________________________ Juglist mailing list [email protected] http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
