What does this do that just using the juju binary on your local system doesn't do?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jorge O. Castro <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > First, if you haven't seen this yet, this is a docker container that > let's you just try Juju, with the limitation that you can't do the > local provider. > > - https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/whitmo/jujubox/ > - https://github.com/whitmo/jujubox > > And here's the new bits, Cory Johns has been working on making a juju > docker container that is more useful for charm developers and testers > (so it's a bit larger than the jujubox) > > - https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/johnsca/charmbox/ > - https://github.com/juju-solutions/charmbox > > Again the limitation is you can't use the local provider, however if > you're testing on public clouds then you should see dramatic workflow > speed vs. using the vagrant boxes. > > PRs and feedback all welcome! > > -- > Jorge Castro > Canonical Ltd. > http://juju.ubuntu.com/ - Automate your Cloud Infrastructure > > -- > Juju mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
