Addendum: the actual command to run is:
docker run -ti -v $HOME/.juju-1.23:/home/ubuntu/.juju
adamisrael/juju-1.23
On 2015-03-27 11:43 AM, Adam Israel wrote:
> I just finished building a docker image for anyone who wants to test
> juju 1.23-beta2 in a clean environment. By default, it'll setup a new,
> persistent environment:
>
> docker run -ti adamisrael/juju-1.23 -v
> $HOME/.juju-1.23:/home/ubuntu/.juju
>
> I intend to maintain images for each released version of juju, as well
> as a nightly build of trunk.
>
> Issues, suggestions, and pull requests welcome:
>
> https://github.com/AdamIsrael/dockerfiles/tree/master/juju/1.23
>
>
> On 2015-03-27 10:16 AM, Charles Butler wrote:
>> Using the docker box is a complete isolation from your local system.
>> We're building docker images to scratch some itches:
>>
>> - Run latest juju in full isolation so we can test the new features
>> as they land
>> - Isolate dependencies during charm reviews. (00-setup as sudo on
>> your system leaves WHAT behind exactly?)
>> - A portable method to try things, and get other users started
>> - Doing something interesting? commit a layer and share it!
>>
>> There's more implications here than I have listed - but it's a good
>> start to see why we are exploring the distribution of dockerfiles for
>> juju client usage.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>>
>>
>> Charles Butler <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> - Juju Charmer
>> Come see the future of datacenter orchestration: http://jujucharms.com
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Nate Finch
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> What does this do that just using the juju binary on your local
>> system doesn't do?
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jorge O. Castro
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> First, if you haven't seen this yet, this is a docker
>> container that
>> let's you just try Juju, with the limitation that you can't
>> do the
>> local provider.
>>
>> - https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/whitmo/jujubox/
>> - https://github.com/whitmo/jujubox
>>
>> And here's the new bits, Cory Johns has been working on
>> making a juju
>> docker container that is more useful for charm developers and
>> testers
>> (so it's a bit larger than the jujubox)
>>
>> - https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/johnsca/charmbox/
>> - https://github.com/juju-solutions/charmbox
>>
>> Again the limitation is you can't use the local provider,
>> however if
>> you're testing on public clouds then you should see dramatic
>> workflow
>> speed vs. using the vagrant boxes.
>>
>> PRs and feedback all welcome!
>>
>> --
>> Jorge Castro
>> Canonical Ltd.
>> http://juju.ubuntu.com/ - Automate your Cloud Infrastructure
>>
>> --
>> Juju mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Juju mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Juju mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
