That's great to hear that we're addressing issues that our community hasn't been very vocal about yet.
I feel that the isolation story we're developing with this docker image is really going to help the developer/testing story. Cory Johns has put in some work and instructions on how to leverage the local provider on your host ubuntu - in tandem with the docker box so you get an isolated runner, while still leveraging the local provider. Its not perfect - but certainly closer to realization than us firing up lxc in docker. Instructions are in the README here: https://github.com/juju-solutions/charmbox/blob/master/README.md All the best, Charles Butler <charles.but...@canonical.com> - Juju Charmer Come see the future of datacenter orchestration: http://jujucharms.com On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:50 PM, sheila miguez <she...@pobox.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Jorge O. Castro <jo...@ubuntu.com> > wrote: > >> let's you just try Juju, with the limitation that you can't do the >> local provider. >> > > I definitely appreciate the ability to test something isolated from my > system. I was trying to accomplish this by nesting linux containers so that > I could use the local provider from juju within a container, but did not > get it to work. > > > -- > she...@pobox.com > > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju > >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
