+1 for emulating the Rust site -- John
On Dec 9, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Joey Huchette <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the [Rust website](http://www.rust-lang.org/) is pretty fantastic, in > terms of both design and content. Having the code examples runnable and > editable (via JuliaBox) would be a killer feature, though I have no idea how > feasible that is. > > On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 6:54:33 PM UTC-5, Elliot Saba wrote: > Perhaps not now, but as a long-term goal, having a live, editable widget of > code on the homepage is such an awesome draw-in, IMO. > -E > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Leah Hanson <[email protected]> wrote: > Seeing code examples of a type and a couple of functions that use it would > probably give a good idea of what the code looks like. The JuMP seems > exciting enough to highlight both as a package and a use of macros. > > I don't know if you want to encourage different styles, but seeing examples > of Python like, c like, and functional-ish ways of writing Julia would be a > way to show off the variety of things you can do. > > --Leah > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:50 AM Elliot Saba <[email protected]> wrote: > We're having intermittent DNS issues. http://julialang.org is now up for me > however, and I can dig it: (I couldn't, previously) > > $ dig julialang.org > > ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> julialang.org > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 56740 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 4 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;julialang.org. IN A > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > julialang.org. 2202 IN CNAME julialang.github.io. > julialang.github.io. 2202 IN CNAME github.map.fastly.net. > github.map.fastly.net. 15 IN A 199.27.79.133 > ... > -E > > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:46 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:23:26 AM UTC+10, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > We're looking to redesign the JuliaLang.org home page and try to give it a > little more focus than it currently has. Which raises the question of what to > focus on. We could certainly have better code examples and maybe highlight > features of the language and its ecosystem better. What do people think we > should include? > > The whole site seems to be offline? Is that because of this? > >
