I like the Haskell one better than the Rust one. --Tim
On Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:14:41 PM Valentin Churavy wrote: > An other nice example might be the new haskell > homepage http://new-www.haskell.org/ > > For the runnable part. Maybe we could use tmpnb/juliabox to host an example > notebook. We should probably use a docker image with an userimages > otherwise the attention span will be over before Gadfly is loaded. > > Does this work for more than 10 > minutes? > https://cfa4733.tmpnb.org/user-C6qXAatonjbQ/notebooks/Julia%20Test.ipynb#? > On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 07:16:42 UTC+1, cdm wrote: > > re tight code ... > > > > S. Danisch's code length v. speed plot may well be deserving of some real > > esate: > > > > > > > > https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-7IPcrjXuxFY/VICwQ3TrgRI/AAAAAAAAJV0/_Hm > > DWZiBrXQ/s1600/benchmarks.png > > > > > > > > awesome. > > > > cdm > > > > On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 9:09:03 PM UTC-8, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Leah Hanson <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> I don't know if you want to encourage different styles, but seeing > >>> examples of Python like, c like, and functional-ish ways of writing > >>> Julia > >>> would be a way to show off the variety of things you can do. > >> > >> I really this idea. Having a grid of four code examples with different > >> styles – Pythonic/Matlabish, C-like, functional and Julian (i.e. with > >> types > >> and multiple dispatch). Now we just need to come up with good examples. > >> Another thing I wonder if it would be good to highlight is how tight the > >> code generated for simple, high-level Julia code is. Maybe not on the > >> main > >> page though but on the about page.
