Yes, METADATA packages should be pretty usable when someone downloads them. Now that we have the documentation on new documentation, packages can start including docs too. I wonder if we can set a minimum code coverage requirement, and if we can somehow also measure doc coverage for exported functions.
-viral On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 2:57:01 AM UTC+5:30, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > Packages registered in METADATA should be pretty usable – they should > generally have some tests and those tests should pass. They should also > have documentation. We haven't been very strict about enforcing all of > this, but I think that going forward we ought to be. > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Luthaf <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you do accept unfinished and very alpha package, I can submit one >> right now ... >> >> It won't be very usable, but I am wondering about how finished should be >> a package when submitted to METADATA. >> >> Viral Shah a écrit : >> >> I wonder what the 500th package will be. >> >> -viral >> >> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 9:02:45 PM UTC+5:30, Iain Dunning wrote: >>> >>> Just noticed on http://pkg.julialang.org/pulse.html that we are at 499 >>> registered packages with at least one version tagged that are Julia 0.4-dev >>> compatible (493 on Julia 0.3). >>> >>> Thanks to all the package developers for their efforts in growing the >>> Julia package ecosystem! >>> >>> >
