Packages being registered and tagged between the 0.3 run and the 0.4 run -- pretty cool!
The package I'm thinking of (Geodesy.jl) was registered and tagged on the 19th (merged ~13:00 EST), so maybe the run marked '2015-01-20' was kicked off on the 19th at 2AM EST? I don't know if there's an ideal dating scheme, but the date of the last METADATA pull (between the 0.3 and 0.4 runs) seems like a reasonable upper bound, not that you don't have much more important things on your plate :). On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 10:41:29 AM UTC-7, Iain Dunning wrote: > > Only tagged packages are counted. Also, I have to manually push to the > website still, even though PackageEval hasn't had a problem in a long time. > I should probably let my baby fly and let it fully automatically run. The > date is the date I push it on - the actual run happens at around 2AM EST, > which has actually led to packages being run only on 0.4 the first time > because they weren't in METADATA when the 0.3 tests were run - a pretty > narrow window! > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Sean Garborg <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I think we were over 500 in METADATA last time the pulse was updated. I >> just know because I registered a package on the 19th and it wasn't in the >> 1/20 status changes. Curious, would that be due to METADATA being updated >> manually, or the batch taking ~12 hours or so, or the batch needing to be >> restarted/resumed sometimes, or the date representing more of a post date >> than a run date? >> >> >> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 2:08:48 PM UTC-7, Luthaf wrote: >>> >>> If you do accept unfinished and very alpha package, I can submit one >>> right now ... >>> >>> It won't be very usable, but I am wondering about how finished should be >>> a package when submitted to METADATA. >>> >>> Viral Shah a écrit : >>> >>> I wonder what the 500th package will be. >>> >>> -viral >>> >>> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 9:02:45 PM UTC+5:30, Iain Dunning wrote: >>>> >>>> Just noticed on http://pkg.julialang.org/pulse.html that we are at 499 >>>> registered packages with at least one version tagged that are Julia >>>> 0.4-dev >>>> compatible (493 on Julia 0.3). >>>> >>>> Thanks to all the package developers for their efforts in growing the >>>> Julia package ecosystem! >>>> >>>> > > > -- > *Iain Dunning* > PhD Candidate > <http://orc.scripts.mit.edu/people/student.php?name=idunning> / MIT > Operations Research Center <http://web.mit.edu/orc/www/> > http://iaindunning.com / http://juliaopt.org >
