That is really weird, I have no explanation. If it says updated on 01-20, its for METADATA (and the last green build for Julia 0.4) as at 2AM EST on the 20th. Weird... It is up now for the 21st.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Sean Garborg <[email protected]> wrote: > Packages being registered and tagged between the 0.3 run and the 0.4 run > -- pretty cool! > > The package I'm thinking of (Geodesy.jl) was registered and tagged on the > 19th (merged ~13:00 EST), so maybe the run marked '2015-01-20' was kicked > off on the 19th at 2AM EST? I don't know if there's an ideal dating scheme, > but the date of the last METADATA pull (between the 0.3 and 0.4 runs) seems > like a reasonable upper bound, not that you don't have much more important > things on your plate :). > > On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 10:41:29 AM UTC-7, Iain Dunning wrote: >> >> Only tagged packages are counted. Also, I have to manually push to the >> website still, even though PackageEval hasn't had a problem in a long time. >> I should probably let my baby fly and let it fully automatically run. The >> date is the date I push it on - the actual run happens at around 2AM EST, >> which has actually led to packages being run only on 0.4 the first time >> because they weren't in METADATA when the 0.3 tests were run - a pretty >> narrow window! >> >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Sean Garborg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I think we were over 500 in METADATA last time the pulse was updated. I >>> just know because I registered a package on the 19th and it wasn't in the >>> 1/20 status changes. Curious, would that be due to METADATA being updated >>> manually, or the batch taking ~12 hours or so, or the batch needing to be >>> restarted/resumed sometimes, or the date representing more of a post date >>> than a run date? >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 2:08:48 PM UTC-7, Luthaf wrote: >>>> >>>> If you do accept unfinished and very alpha package, I can submit one >>>> right now ... >>>> >>>> It won't be very usable, but I am wondering about how finished should >>>> be a package when submitted to METADATA. >>>> >>>> Viral Shah a écrit : >>>> >>>> I wonder what the 500th package will be. >>>> >>>> -viral >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 9:02:45 PM UTC+5:30, Iain Dunning wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Just noticed on http://pkg.julialang.org/pulse.html that we are at >>>>> 499 registered packages with at least one version tagged that are Julia >>>>> 0.4-dev compatible (493 on Julia 0.3). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks to all the package developers for their efforts in growing the >>>>> Julia package ecosystem! >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> -- >> *Iain Dunning* >> PhD Candidate >> <http://orc.scripts.mit.edu/people/student.php?name=idunning> / MIT >> Operations Research Center <http://web.mit.edu/orc/www/> >> http://iaindunning.com / http://juliaopt.org >> > -- *Iain Dunning* PhD Candidate <http://orc.scripts.mit.edu/people/student.php?name=idunning> / MIT Operations Research Center <http://web.mit.edu/orc/www/> http://iaindunning.com / http://juliaopt.org
