Ok, but won't happen until tomorrow at the earliest.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Jacob Quinn <[email protected]> wrote:

> Go for it Stefan; in the mean time, I'll try to get your TimeZones.jl
> running :)
>
> -Jacob
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I had need for this recently and would support having it. I can also take
>> a crack at coding it up if Jacob or someone else doesn't beat me to it.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:34 AM, David Anthoff <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I’ve created a new Excel file reading package, and in Excel you can have
>>> cells that have a time, but no date part. I’m trying to figure out in what
>>> type I should return those values… I could certainly just format them as
>>> strings for now, I guess… I myself don’t have a use for it, I just want to
>>> make sure the package does something meaningful if it comes across a file
>>> with such a cell.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jacob Quinn
>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2015 2:27 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [julia-users] Time type
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There isn't, mainly because there hasn't seem to be much demand/use for
>>> it (plus the ever constrained dev effort required). I'm pretty sure I
>>> mocked something up at one point, but don't know if I have any code still
>>> lying around. Happy to help push this if there's enough interest.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Jacob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:06 AM, David Anthoff <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> is there a Time datatype, analogous to the Date type? I ran into a
>>> situation where I need to represent times (like 12:34 pm) that don’t have a
>>> date associated. I understand that in the case of dates that don’t have a
>>> time component I’d use Date (instead of DateTime), but I couldn’t find
>>> anything the other way around, for times that don’t have a date.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to