Yes, but the representation is quite inefficient. This would be an efficient scalar type.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Steven G. Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 9:06:28 AM UTC-4, David Anthoff wrote: >> >> is there a Time datatype, analogous to the Date type? I ran into a >> situation where I need to represent times (like 12:34 pm) that don’t have a >> date associated. I understand that in the case of dates that don’t have a >> time component I’d use Date (instead of DateTime), but I couldn’t find >> anything the other way around, for times that don’t have a date. >> > > Couldn't you represent this as a time interval, i.e. > > Dates.Hour(12) + Dates.Minute(34) > > ? >
